This is a video that I never get tired of watching, and I've watched it many times. Before we get too deep into "blaming biology" for our quirks, here are some things to think about. How quirky does our behavior have to be before it is a disease or disorder rather than just the extreme end of a continuum of normal behavior? If our behavior changes after a change (damage, disease) in the brain, how small can that change in the brain be and still result in "disordered behavior"? If we strike and injure someone while having an epileptic convulsion, who is at fault? What if we push someone off a rooftop while in the throes of paranoid delusions? What if we suddenly begin cursing (or barking or quacking) at everyone we see after suffering a high fever due to a streptococcal infection? Robert Sapolsky on Individual Differences https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-PpDq1WUtAw I. the line between the essence of a person and his/her disease or disorder A. epilepsy - is an epileptic criminally liable for striking someone while he's having a convulsion? B. schizophrenia - how much of their behavior are schizophrenic people responsible for? C. learning disorders - vs. stupidity and laziness D. John Hinckley (who attempted to assassinate President Reagan, in case you don't remember) - did he "get away with it"? II. disorder vs. extreme end of a continuum of normal behavior III. the person sitting next to you does not have the same frontal cortex that you do A. individual differences B. frontal lobe and disinhibition C. Huntington's disease and disinhibition 1. initially a disease of frontal cortex 2. sexual promiscuity and reproductive success 3. is this a "disease" or an evolutionary innovation that increases reproductive fitness? D. Tourette's disease E. PANDAS - neuroendocrine disease associated with streptococcal infection 1. breakdown of blood-brain barrier 2. autoimmune disorder in the brain 3. similar to Tourettes with strange tics and so forth 4. treated with immunosuppressant drugs F. obsessive-compulsive disorder 1. related to high fever and strep infections 2. genetic contribution 3. increased metabolic rate in the basal ganglia 4. is this "neurological" or "psychological"? - all behavior has some sort of underpinning in the brain, after all IV. are these syndromes neurological or psychiatric? A. Jerusalem syndrome B. Stendhal's syndrome (or Florence syndrome) C. trichotillomania (compulsive hair pulling) with trichophagia (hair eating) D. apotemnophilia - obsessive desire to have a limb removed by amputation E. acrotomophilia - obsessive desire to have sex with amputees (note: he gets these last two backwards in the video) F. one case of obsession with polka music after a person had a small stroke in the frontal lobe V. difference between neuropsychiatric disease and individual differences A. regular or ritualistic behaviors vs. compulsions - I have to count the number of beeps my thermometer makes while I'm taking my temperture, and if I'm distracted and lose count, I become (mildly) upset; is that a compulsion? B. we all have milder elements of behavior that in a more severe form would be considered a "disease" - is that because we have milder forms of the brain alterations that result in the disease? (probably) C. there but for the grace of God and a few glutamate receptors in the frontal lobe go I D. explaining these things biologically is a challenge to our sense of individuality and uniqueness _ what happens once we explain "everything"? E. social issues F. if you become a doctor or a counselor, you will someday be making decisions that have profound effects on other people's lives, and those decisions will sometimes be based on inadequate information or knowledge about the person's condition G. does being healthy mean we have the same diseases as everyone else does? VI. "Now even physics knows sin." - Robert Oppenheimer